Tag Archives: biking

The Tire Pressure Revolution, by Jan Heine

The Tire Pressure Revolution – By Jan Heine

In recent years, there has been a trend toward wider tires and lower tire pressures. We now hear from many sources that wider tires can roll faster than narrower ones, which contradicts what most of us used to believe. In the past, cyclists thought that higher tire pressures decreased the tires’ rolling resistance.

clip_image001

What has changed?

At Bicycle Quarterly, we’ve been researching tire performance for the last eight years, and the most revolutionary finding is this: Tire pressure has almost no effect on a tire’s speed. We did not believe it at first, either, so we’ve tested it numerous times. It’s been confirmed time and again, with different methodologies. Below is only one dataset, click here for more data…

clip_image002

If it all looks confusing, that’s because it’s not as simple as we thought. Rolling resistance does vary slightly with tire pressure, but it’s not linear, and it depends on the surface. On smooth surfaces like the one used in the tests shown above, moderately high tire pressure – say 100-110 psi for a 25 mm tire – actually rolls slower than either a lower pressure (80 psi) or a higher pressure (130 psi). On rough surfaces, higher pressures roll significantly slower.

Tire Pressure Doesn’t Matter for Performance

The variations are much smaller and hard to predict – they depend on the tire as much as on the road surface – so the take-home message is that tire pressure doesn’t matter enough to worry about it. Inflate your tires enough that they don’t collapse when you corner at speed, and you have found the optimum pressure for your tires. It’s that simple.

A detailed explanation of why this happens is beyond the scope of this article, but basically, on a bike, the resistance of tires consists of two types of energy losses. One is from deformation of the tire, and higher pressures reduce that deformation. The second loss occurs from the vibrations of the bike, and those increase with higher pressures. The two effects roughly cancel each other, which is why tire pressure doesn’t have a big effect on rolling resistance. In the past, researchers focused only on the tire deformation and overlooked the losses due to vibrations, hence the belief that higher pressures rolled faster.

New Tire Design

The real revolution brought about by this new research is not how you use your pump, but rather how tires are constructed. It’s not an overstatement that it has revolutionized our understanding of tires.

Again, in the past, we all believed that higher tire pressures made tires roll faster. We also knew that supple casings made tires faster. However, supple casings don’t handle high pressure well, so the only way to combine high pressures and supple casings is to make the tire narrow. For wider tires, you had two choices, and neither was good:

1)  Beef up the casing, which makes the tire less supple and slower.

2)  Lower the pressure, which we thought made the tire slower.

No matter which route you took, the science of the day predicted that your wider tire would be slower. It was a Catch-22, and for the best performance, you stuck with narrow tires, where you could have a supple casing and high pressure at the same time.

You can see where this is heading. If lower pressures don’t make tires slower, then you can create wide tires with supple casings. You run them at lower pressures, and you don’t give up any performance on smooth roads. On rough roads, you actually gain speed, because the tire (and you) bounce less. And on all roads, you are more comfortable. Instead of a Catch-22, you have a win-win-win situation.

It took a while for this research to become accepted, but once the professional cycling teams started testing tires with power meters on the road, they found that the wider tires, run at lower pressures, were as fast, or faster, than the narrower tires they had been running. Add to that the better cornering grip – more rubber on the road, less bouncing that can break traction – and it didn’t take long for the pros to go from 23 to 25 mm tires.

23 to 25 mm may not sound like much – less than 10% wider. But when you look at the air volume – the area of a circle goes up with the square of the radius – you get 18% more air volume. That is significant.

On smooth roads, 25s are about as fast you get – our research indicates that 28s and 32s aren’t slower, but neither are they any faster (that includes air resistance at speeds of about 18 mph). That means that if your bike can handle wider tires, you can get more comfort and better cornering with wider tires, without losing any speed.

On the average backroad, wider tires make your cycling much more enjoyable: the significant additional air volume they allow makes for a more comfortable ride, and they better handle the bumps and related vibrations, in effect smoothing out the ride. Additional good news is that when they are made right, these wider tires aren’t any slower than narrower ones.

clip_image003

Supple Casings

To get the most benefit out of these lower pressures, you need supple tires. A stiff sidewall takes more energy to flex, so the tire will be slower. It also will vibrate more, so you lose more energy that way, too. You could call it a “lose-lose” situation.

The second most important thing our research found was that tires can make a larger difference in your bike’s performance than any other component. At moderately high speeds of 18-20 mph, a supple tire can make you 8-10% faster than a stiffer, but otherwise similar tire. That is far more than the difference a set of aero wheels makes (1-2%).

Professional racers have known this all along: As much as their equipment has changed over time, they’ve always ridden supple tires. They usually ride hand-made tubulars. There also are very fast-rolling racing clincher tires, but if you rode on rougher backroads and needed wider tires, you were out of luck: Most wide tires were either intended for city bikes and have stiff casings and puncture-proof belts, or they were designed for high pressures, which also requires stiff casings. Either way, these tires were slow and uncomfortable.

When we saw the results of our studies on tire performance, we realized that wide tires could be as fast as narrow ones, while offering more comfort and the ability to tackle rougher surfaces and even gravel.

clip_image004

We decided to take matters into our own hands to create wide tires that roll as fast as narrow ones. We worked with Panaracer and developed tires that use the same casings as high-end tubulars, but in much wider widths, and as clincher tires. We started Compass Bicycles, a sister company to Bicycle Quarterly, to develop components based on the findings of our research, including Compass tires, which are available in widths between 26 and 42 mm, and in several wheel sizes. RBR’s Coach Fred Matheny has reviewed both our Stampede Pass 700 x 32 Tires and our Barlow Pass Extralight 700 x 38 Tires.

Conclusion

Tire pressure does not significantly affect your bike’s rolling resistance, but the casing construction of your tires does. This means that you can ride lower pressures without going slower, and that wide tires are no slower than narrow ones – as long as they have similar casings. The fastest tires have supple casings that consume less energy when they flex, and transmit fewer vibrations, creating a win-win situation. These tires roll super-fast no matter at what pressure you run them.

Jan Heine is the editor of Bicycle Quarterly, a magazine about the culture, technology and history of cycling. After racing for a decade, he now enjoys randonneuring and cycling off the beaten path. His blog is at www.janheine.wordpress.com.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Biking

USADA Snowballing Lance and Team

Lance Armstrong faces sanction from the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and has been banned from triathlon competition until the resolution of the investigation. The Washington Post reported June 13 that USADA has sent the seven-time Tour de France champion and others a 15-page letter outlining the allegations that stem from his run with the U.S. Postal Service and Discovery team between 1998 and 2005, as well as his comeback in 2009-2010.

image

USADA alleges that Armstrong is among six individuals at the center of the investigation. Others reportedly named in the letter include RadioShack-Nissan manager Johan Bruyneel, Doctors Michele Ferrari, Pedro Celaya and Luis Garcia del Moral, and trainer Jose Pepi Marti.

This investigation appears to have some motive that is designed to punish those that are accused without actual proof of any transgression. Lance has been tested over 500 times and not once has he been tested positive.

The charges appear to be based on the investigation that was dropped by the federal prosecutor for lack of evidence. It is well known that when USADA charges an athletic they are guilty and cannot buck the system to prove their innocence even when they are innocent. So it is assumed that Lance and his support team will be found guilty of being in the cross-hairs of USADA and will lose all they have gained through the 14-year period USADA is investigating.

USADA alleged it had collected blood samples from Armstrong in 2009 and 2010 that were “fully consistent with blood manipulation including EPO use and/or blood transfusions.” If that is the case why did USADA not charge Lance when the samples were taken and tested? Yes, the USADA says that they could not investigate while the federal prosecutor was investigating. But there is apparent hope from USADA that Lance would be prosecuted and then they could take all his accomplishments away. Yet they do not have any positive tests to validate their claims until two years after the event was supposedly occurred.

History has shown that the athletes have had to spend millions of dollars to defend themselves only to understand they had not a chance against USADA charges regardless of guilt or innocence.

When you hear that these charges are a vendetta, you can believe that is exactly what is happening. USADA for some strange reason wants to claim they cleaned up a sport that had rampant drug users and prove they are capable of ruining the lives of people that have yet to be tested positive for any banned substances. This is indeed a kangaroo court and we can predict that they will do anything they can to discredit Lance Armstrong and his support staff.

Shame on you USADA. Slap your hands USADA.

Leave a comment

Filed under Biking

Lance Armstrong Charges Dropped

lance armstrong out climbing everyoneLance Armstrong has been fighting charges from the Los Angeles Federal Prosecutor for the last two years that stemmed from what his distractors claimed was his use of illegal drugs to win seven Tour de France championships. There were people that claimed to have seen him inject drugs into his body. There were people that were trying to assert their claims that he used drugs to enhance his biking performance to win championships that elevated him to the only man in history that has won more than five Tour de France championships.

alberto contadorIn the time since Lance won his last championship, two riders have been disqualified for testing positive for illegal drugs in their body. Alberto Contador was the latest when he was determined to have tested for clenbuterol in 2010 Tour de France and his appeals process started. Now in February of 2012 he was determined to have used the drug illegally and his title was vacated.

floyd_landis_001Floyd Landis was tested for testosterone in 2006 during the Tour de France his title was vacated after his appeal process was completed.

The question we all are asking is how each case is different and is Lance Armstrong guilty enough to go to jail and have all seven of his Tour de France titles vacated? The basic difference comes down to one simple fact. Lance was tested hundreds of times. Each and every test result was negative. for drug in his system. All the rumors and innuendo are not enough to take him to criminal court and convict him with insufficient evidence. The actual evidence was not there. Now to use the OJ analysis: “If the glove does not fit you can’t convict.”

lance and alberto

We will never know for sure if Lance used drugs.  I have talked to many people that are active in the Pro Racing Circuit as racers and support personnel. They are adamant that drugs are used and the testing still lags the doping. So as long as that is the prevailing course of action we will have doping rampant in the Pro Biking Circuit.

1 Comment

Filed under Biking